CG数据库 >> Audiobro – LA Scoring Strings 2.0 16bit Version

Audiobro – LA Scoring Strings 2.0 16bit Version的图片1

密码: r8hy

Audiobro LA Scoring Strings 2.0 - unofficial 16bit version | 9.34GB

Starting from version 2.0, Audiobro stopped supplying 16bit samples and replaced them with 24bit only. In this instace, 24bit is a waste of space, since all samples are normalized and their noise level is far above -90dBFS.

So I made myself this 16bit version and hopefully not just for myself.

16bit samples were taken from previous LASS release, compressed, converted and resaved for use with 2.0 patches. That alone took 18 hours since Kontakt file management engine is not optimized for multicore processors

This is 24bit sample:

And this is 16bit:

As you can see, no big difference. There's faint residue of ATH noise shaping at the end of the spectrum, but that is above 18kHz, so not a problem. Also it's just 10dB difference.

The advantages of 16bit in this case outweigh the extra 10dB at 20kHz:

- Lower RAM requirements

- Takes up less HDD space (9.5GB vs 15GB)

- More CPU efficient

Decide for yourself if you prefer 16bit or 24bit.

audiobro LA评分弦2 -非官方版本| 9.34gb 16bit

从2版开始,audiobro停止供应16bit样本,取而代之的只有24。本实例文档,24bit是浪费空间,因为所有的样本进行归一化处理和噪声水平远高于90dbfs。

所以我自己做了这16位版本,但愿不只是我自己。

16bit样本取自以前的姑娘释放,压缩,转换和保存使用2补丁。仅花了18个小时,因为中国的文件管理发动机是不是多核处理器的优化

这是24位样本:

这是16位:

正如你所看到的,没有什么大的不同。有ATH噪声整形在光谱的一端微弱的残留,但高于18kHz,所以没有问题。也就是10dB的区别。

16位在这种情况下,优势大于额外10dB 20kHz:

•较低的内存需求

-占用硬盘空间(9.5GB的通信与15GB)

•更多的处理器效率

决定你是否喜欢16bit或24bit。